NY Times the prophet of Doom and Gloom
Imagine There’s No Religion, But Global Warming’s True,
the only News and Ad source, Is NY Times daily news
Imagine theirs no parties,only liberals tried and true
We've all become one nation,Commie's thru and thru
The temparture is freezing, we saved the ozone you know
There's polars now in Florida,we're one big ice cap of snow
Peta saved all the animals,there's more of them than us
you cannot see our faces,just our eyes through the burkas
Imagine there's no Jesus, who was he anyway
Traditional bible burning, on former Christmas Day
Our civil servant children , come home once a year
to see their friends and family, and attend the earth day fair
Imagine that caucasians, are the illegal ones you know
Mexicans and Muslims, all run the daily show
We bow down to the Master, Barrack Hussein Obama
He has come to save us, No more health care trauma
We are all under 50, the elderly are dead
we used all that money, to kill unborn babies instead
The populations shrinking, of people now that is
The animals are growing, they sometimes eat our kids
But we cannot touch them, Peta protects their rights
We cannot own guns, we have no right to fight
If we do not follow, the "chosen one"each day
we get shippped off to Venzuela, to become Chavez slaves
Ahmadenijhad is VP, all the Jews are gone
they were sent to Isreal, before the Dirty bomb
Life is just so wonderful, we must believe today
so many others dead now, bread line's shorter everyday
We do not eat the meat now, no animals can die
we eat our "Tofu Spam" and natural Green Juice pie
some pray that their the next ones they don't want to live this lie
they pray that their are next to be the ones to die
but we all love each other, Gays, Les and Trans alike
(yes, I know its a bit extreme, but not unbelievable now is it?)
from Stop The ACLU by Warner Todd Huston
Imagine there’s no religion, it’s easy for The New York Times to do — even in a Christmas Day editorial that somehow forgets that Christmas is about Christ’s birth. In fact, the NYT decided that this Christmas was its opportunity to wallow in worse-than-ever sentiments and to bemoan that this year’s Christmas isn’t as good as it used to be. Oh, they tried to dress it up a bit by saying it is great to have a Christmas that gets us back to basics and also by slipping in some global warming clap trap, but it is still a lament that we all have it so darn bad these days.
The Christmas Day editorial starts off surmising that “you may be wondering about the carbon equation of a Christmas tree,” though it is a bit amusing to see them make such a silly assumption. I’d rather bet that even most environuts weren’t thinking about their Christmas carbon footprint when they awoke that morning! But, not the NYT.
They are all worried that those old Christmas lights are going to cause the end of the planet as we know it! Then the Times lapses into its first lament on these horrible days in which we live. This may be the Christmas when you wonder, or are forced to find out, just how much of the material Christmas you can leave behind. It may be the one that redefines Christmas entirely — for better or worse. Read the rest
Comments